Orchestration design
Who does what, in which order, and what happens when two agents reach for the same task.
One agent struggles with a whole business process. A small team of specialist agents, with an orchestrator keeping them in line, can run it. We design and build those teams.
Give a single agent a whole process, like getting delayed shipments back on track, and it has to juggle data, predictions, actions and customer messages in one long prompt. It gets slow, it gets confused and it’s hard to test.
So we split the work. An orchestrator plans the steps and hands each one to an agent built for it: one fetches records, one runs forecasts, one updates systems, one talks to customers. Each agent is small enough to test properly and has only the access its job needs. A person signs off anything risky.
Who does what, in which order, and what happens when two agents reach for the same task.
Narrow agents for data, prediction, action and communication that are easy to test and replace.
A single record of the task that every agent reads and writes, so nothing gets lost between steps.
Each agent gets only the tools and data its job needs, so a mistake in one can’t spread.
Approval steps where a person checks risky or unusual actions before they happen.
See every decision each agent made, replay a run and turn failures into test cases.
One agent picks the courier for every order, one watches for SLA failures, one keeps customers updated on WhatsApp and SMS, and a chatbot handles bookings and weight disputes.
An AI agent books jobs and builds crew schedules for a landscaping business that grew into a full field-service app.
Sensors in each room and AI activity detection that tell caregivers when something looks wrong, so nobody has to watch a screen.
We write down how the work really flows today, including the exceptions people handle by hand.
Which agents, what each may touch, where the orchestrator decides and where a person approves.
We run the system on past cases and compare its choices with what your team actually did.
Start with suggestions, then let agents act on the easy cases while people keep the hard ones.
A multi-agent system is a group of AI agents that each handle one part of a job, coordinated by an orchestrator that plans the work, assigns steps and checks results. It suits processes that are too broad for one agent to handle reliably.
Orchestration is the layer that decides which agent acts, in what order, with what information, and what happens when something fails or two agents need the same resource. It also decides when to stop and ask a person.
When the process mixes very different skills, like reading data, forecasting, changing records and writing to customers, or when it has many exceptions. If one well-defined task is the goal, a single agent is usually simpler.
It’s easier, if it’s designed well. Small agents with narrow permissions are simpler to test than one agent that can do everything, and every handover between them is logged.
Often LangGraph, sometimes our own orchestration on queues and event streams. We choose based on how complex the flow is and where it needs to run.
We aim to have a first version suggesting actions on real cases early in the project, then widen what it does as the results hold up. You’ll get a written plan and timeline after a free 30-minute call.
A senior engineer will reply within one business day.
AI assistant · replies instantly
AI can make mistakes. Don’t share sensitive information. Privacy